News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YouTuber Says Cops Visited Him After He Built a Flock-Sty... by dfxm12 on Friday October 09, 2026 @08:14PM (#50028169)
Many laws constricting police activity and related to data collected by police go ignored.
Re:YouTuber Says Cops Visited Him After He Built a Flock-Sty... by gentooflux on Friday October 09, 2026 @08:41PM (#50028299)
Many laws are ignored. The solution is not no laws.
Re:YouTuber Says Cops Visited Him After He Built a Flock-Sty... by queenkjuul on Friday October 09, 2026 @10:09PM (#50028825)
The point is that we should just prohibit the cameras entirely, not play this game where we make rules about their use which will be ignored
Re:YouTuber Says Cops Visited Him After He Built a Flock-Sty... by what on Friday October 09, 2026 @11:22PM (#50029228)
Rules about their use will be ignored but rules about installing them won’t. Makes sense.
Re:YouTuber Says Cops Visited Him After He Built a Flock-Sty... by queenkjuul on Sunday October 11, 2026 @08:46AM (#50042733)
Yes, if the company that makes them is shut down there won't be any to install, and if they're banned but seen on the street they'll be easy to take down. Are you serious right now
Re:YouTuber Says Cops Visited Him After He Built a Flock-Sty... by Retric on Friday October 09, 2026 @09:25PM (#50028576)
Less so when it costs prosecutions. Cops collectively spend quite a long while reading people their Maranda warning for example.
Re:YouTuber Says Cops Visited Him After He Built a Flock-Sty... by LorenPechtel on Friday October 09, 2026 @09:47PM (#50028698)
Exactly. Laws get followed when there are likely adverse consequences from not following them. We don't need huge punishments, we need likely punishments.
Re:YouTuber Says Cops Visited Him After He Built a Flock-Sty... by bluegatty on Friday October 09, 2026 @10:45PM (#50029018)
illegally collected evidence is usually grounds for inadmission