Re:“Math 2.0” will need to value mathematical progress more ...
by __MatrixMan__ on Thursday October 08, 2026 @01:44PM
(#50009148)
I think "there is no center" and "where you put the center is a matter of taste" are more or less equivalent. And if you're confronted with a pencil and paper and asked to draw the solar system, the latter is more useful.
Re:“Math 2.0” will need to value mathematical progress more ...
by analog31 on Thursday October 08, 2026 @03:32PM
(#50010858)
More useful to us because we know more about how it works. This is why I was specific about the time period.
Re:“Math 2.0” will need to value mathematical progress more ...
by weknowbetter on Thursday October 08, 2026 @01:37PM
(#50009041)
IIRC the universe is a pretty non-unifrom shape.
Then Newton came along and blew all of the models out of the water. Nobody's at the center of the universe [0]. A single theory of gravity models both planetary motion and why we don't get flung off the earth. And we can "feel" the rotation of the earth by experiments which came along later such as Foucault's pendulum and the Coriolis force.
[0] A puzzle I like to taunt my friends with: The earth is in fact equidistant from the edges of the observable universe in all directions, so we must be in the center after all. ;-)