Re:“Math 2.0” will need to value mathematical progress more ...
by schleck8 on Thursday October 08, 2026 @03:25AM
(#50002803)
To many professional mathematicians it's a form of art. But at the end of the day, it's a profession done for money, and even if they like doing it as a day to day job, they'd probably be doing something else if they had absolute freedom over their time. This is how I personally classify things as art or chore. If people continue doing something the same way when there is no financial motive, it's art in its pure form.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:“Math 2.0” will need to value mathematical progress more ...
by david-gpu on Thursday October 08, 2026 @06:12AM
(#50003978)
Some call that "entertainment", or "a hobby".
Re:“Math 2.0” will need to value mathematical progress more ...
by jvvw on Thursday October 08, 2026 @07:19AM
(#50004460)
Based on the research mathematicians I have known, I'd disagree with 'they'd probably be doing something else if they had absolute freedom over their time' for at least a large number of them, although it probably varies from individual to individual.
Re:“Math 2.0” will need to value mathematical progress more ...
by xanderlewis on Thursday October 08, 2026 @07:21AM
(#50004470)
> even if they like doing it as a day to day job, they'd probably be doing something else if they had absolute freedom over their time.
Not the mathematicians I know. They’d happily drop the academic admin stuff, but they’d absolutely keep doing mathematics in much the same way.