Re:“Math 2.0” will need to value mathematical progress more ...
by bonoboTP on Thursday October 08, 2026 @02:03AM
(#50002267)
This has already been the case in AI/ML and computer vision papers via flag planting papers. Have an idea, super quickly publish a hasty work based on it that doest actually work, methodological and eval issues, engineering terrible, slow, bad results etc. But it was the first so now your concurrent work that was much better evaluated, better implemented, etc is suddenly worthless and unpublishable.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.