Re:Git 3.0's upcoming SHA-256 default will be a costly mistake
by lxgr on Friday October 02, 2026 @08:50AM
(#49932949)
> You are not saying anything other than that hashes are useful for signing.
Yes, but you seem to be saying they are not, or maybe just that git hashes are somehow inherently not capable of taking that role, unless I'm misunderstanding.
Yes, but you seem to be saying they are not, or maybe just that git hashes are somehow inherently not capable of taking that role, unless I'm misunderstanding.