News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Git 3.0's upcoming SHA-256 default will be a costly mistake by kazinator on Friday October 02, 2026 @07:58AM (#49932496)
In a SHA-1-based git repo, if a signature were to digest all the bits spanned by a commit, that would be a monotonic improvement over what is done now, even if it falls short of some people's expectations.

Because now, commit X signed by person A does not even attest that the repo looked like X on A's computer, or not very well, due to weaknesses in the hash.

There are no comments on this comment yet.