News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How our vibe coded website looks like a designer made it by augment_me on Tuesday September 29, 2026 @09:23PM (#49903225)
Explain what cannot be picked up on and why.

The LLMs have ingested courses and books on UI, UX, psychology, neuroscience, consumer neuroscience, etc. What makes it incapable of getting this information?

Re:How our vibe coded website looks like a designer made it by UtopiaPunk on Tuesday September 29, 2026 @10:53PM (#49903818)
Ugh, my little kid talks to me like this.

Let's try again. What's a nicer way of saying that?

Re:How our vibe coded website looks like a designer made it by strangecasts on Wednesday September 30, 2026 @04:10AM (#49905903)
Clicking through the website with computer use isn't currently part of the website generation chain for most models, and while there are gaze prediction models, to my knowledge none are productized or universal to the point where you can chuck them in and consistently predict what draws attention on any given page

(Generally I think it is alright to interpret "can't do" in terms of "the common workflow that current models will afford" and not "definitionally incapable of")

Re:How our vibe coded website looks like a designer made it by augment_me on Wednesday September 30, 2026 @11:30AM (#49910284)
Humans have the same limitations in this, we model an idea using prior knowledge for what will draw attention, then we test it and evaluate it.
Re:How our vibe coded website looks like a designer made it by strangecasts on Thursday October 01, 2026 @06:13AM (#49919852)
I was not making an argument about people, I was trying to identify specific reasons why models can produce samey UIs unless guided