News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Backblaze Drive Stats for Q2 2026 by psolidgold on Tuesday September 29, 2026 @07:57PM (#49902512)
Hah. "load bearing" is such a common claude-ism that its legitimate usage now needs to be acknowledged:

"That question is becoming more relevant as higher-capacity drives become more (dare we say) load bearing."

Re:Backblaze Drive Stats for Q2 2026 by happytoexplain on Tuesday September 29, 2026 @08:01PM (#49902548)
It makes me a little physically sick that writing, something I love, is now tainted by the constant nagging thought, "could somebody mistake that sentence as AI?"

Critics of this line of worrying tend to fall into the same category of irrationality/bias as the "just be yourself" advice-givers.

Re:Backblaze Drive Stats for Q2 2026 by psolidgold on Tuesday September 29, 2026 @08:42PM (#49902919)
It is an interesting thought about how these AI-cliches will affect human-written text that will subsequently be used in training - thus perpetuating the cycle.
Re:Backblaze Drive Stats for Q2 2026 by Computer0 on Tuesday September 29, 2026 @11:33PM (#49904064)
Imagine Claude 5.6 starts saying things like “dare I say… load bearing” it wouldn’t be cute anymore
Re:Backblaze Drive Stats for Q2 2026 by hankbond on Tuesday September 29, 2026 @08:42PM (#49902924)
i guess, but to me its not so much "this is ai this is terrible" and more "i'm sick of hearing this phrase all the time". it's not that I never want to see an em-dash ever again, its just that i don't want them used every other sentence.
Re:Backblaze Drive Stats for Q2 2026 by psidebot on Wednesday September 30, 2026 @01:38AM (#49904776)
I feel like there's no way an AI wasn't involved in this paragraph "The appeal is straightforward: more terabytes per drive slot, in the same rack space, at roughly similar drive-level power...."