News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GitHub Says ‘No Thanks’ to Bots — Even if They’re Nice by toobulkeh on Saturday December 29, 2012 @03:17PM (#4983282)
Sounds like a debate between opt-in and opt-out. Why not both? Do an AB test of a Bot vs. a Service. In some cases, opt-in is good (see: organ donors), in other cases it's bad (see: Internet Explorer).

What if there was a community-vote that turned a bot and a particular version of said bot from Opt-Out (app style) to Opt-In (bot style)?

I, for one, welcome our bot-coding overlords that clean up my code and optimize it on each commit. Might save me a lot of time and a lot of power and thought... if it's peer reviewed, like all open source software.

Re:GitHub Says ‘No Thanks’ to Bots — Even if They’re Nice by zalew on Saturday December 29, 2012 @04:32PM (#4983556)
> opt-in is good (see: organ donors)

I prefer when people have to specifically say 'yes, I want my dead body to go to waste instead of saving lives'.

Re:GitHub Says ‘No Thanks’ to Bots — Even if They’re Nice by tomjen3 on Sunday December 30, 2012 @05:19AM (#4985318)
Hey, when you put in price-controls don't complain about a lack of supply.