[Edited] Yes correct.

In the original paper, they measure how much refusal is actively present in the current token and subtract only that specific amount.

In my early baseline step, I used a simpler approach where I just subtracted a fixed vector across the board. This is just to see if the approach is even feasible.

That's actually the main reason I moved to the Engram module, I wanted a smartness that reads the context and turns steering on only when refusal triggers pop up, leaving normal tokens untouched.