News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GitHub Says ‘No Thanks’ to Bots — Even if They’re Nice by jevinskie on Saturday December 29, 2012 @11:58AM (#4982595)
Consider bots as "plugins" that you activate on a per-repo basis. I like this idea!
Re:GitHub Says ‘No Thanks’ to Bots — Even if They’re Nice by masklinn on Saturday December 29, 2012 @12:53PM (#4982770)
Isn't that exactly what Service Hooks or OAuth-authed systems provide?
Re:GitHub Says ‘No Thanks’ to Bots — Even if They’re Nice by uxp on Saturday December 29, 2012 @02:25PM (#4983101)
I think that's what jevinskie was implying, as in this is a non issue since service hooks are already established so there is no reason bots should be allowed, they should plug into the correct API.
Re:GitHub Says ‘No Thanks’ to Bots — Even if They’re Nice by masklinn on Saturday December 29, 2012 @03:46PM (#4983387)
> I think that's what jevinskie was implying

I'm not sure he'd have written that he "likes the idea" and would have failed to mention Service Hooks if he did.

Re:GitHub Says ‘No Thanks’ to Bots — Even if They’re Nice by uxp on Sunday December 30, 2012 @11:06AM (#4986073)
I read his comment as either sarcasm or passive aggressiveness.

"Wouldn't it be a great idea if there was a 'hook' mechanism you could opt into that provides a way to add additional functionality to their site from third parties?"

Or maybe not. I don't know, text doesn't convey emotion and body language.