News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Btrfs/ZFS/bcachefs under workloads classic benchmarks skip. Parent comment

Re:Btrfs/ZFS/bcachefs under workloads classic benchmarks skip by r0l1 on Sunday September 20, 2026 @04:33AM (#49773780)
Might end in a new bcachefs fork beeing included back into mainline. If companies sponsor a few fulltime devs working on the new fork, we finally might have a stable enterprise ready CoW filesystem.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Btrfs/ZFS/bcachefs under workloads classic benchmarks skip by koverstreet on Sunday September 20, 2026 @09:33AM (#49775713)
Uhh, do you know what the upstream stance is on testing and fixing bugs?

I doubt there'd be any real interest in a bastardized fork that only exists so the deep pocketed vendors can get away with code dump and run.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Btrfs/ZFS/bcachefs under workloads classic benchmarks skip by r0l1 on Monday September 21, 2026 @04:51PM (#49793235)
Thought about a real fork going in its own direction. I would love to use bcachefs in all our products. But the current state does not qualify for usage within enterprise environments. Any ideas how to get that fixed? How many core developers are present? Any fallback plans, ...? How to help to get there?
[ Parent | on HN ]