News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple Reference Image: A New Approach for Verified Photog... by lxgr on Wednesday September 16, 2026 @01:14PM (#49730042)
ICAO doc 9303 validation is about 10 lines in Python (on top of importing the right packages) last time I did it around 2012. I doubt it has become harder since then.
Re:Apple Reference Image: A New Approach for Verified Photog... by fweimer on Wednesday September 16, 2026 @01:33PM (#49730341)
Was the public key directory even operational in 2012? What about revocation checking?

I think processing that information is mandatory now, but probably was optional/largely unimplemented in 2012. But maybe I'm off by five years or so?

Re:Apple Reference Image: A New Approach for Verified Photog... by lxgr on Wednesday September 16, 2026 @05:09PM (#49733053)
Revocation checking seems like a big gap, yeah. I’m not aware of any public revocation lists (but I’m also not super familiar with the industry), so I can only assume (hope?) that there are some shadowy but highly accurate databases that KYC providers are tapping into.

The CA public key I just got off my country’s website, they were kind enough to just publish it :)