Re:Mind-altering drugs played key role in rise of Andean civ...
by freebsd_lovefes on Monday September 14, 2026 @03:41PM
(#49702766)
Please state your conflicts of interest before you diminish the impact of that research some more. Can you make yourself argue for the positive effect that article has even a tiny bit? That we are a happy peoples who are discovering just how profound of an effect nACHR agonists like nicotine can have? Focus on the positives.
Re:Mind-altering drugs played key role in rise of Andean civ...
by TimTheTinker on Monday September 14, 2026 @05:28PM
(#49704355)
No conflicts of interest, and I'm not diminishing the impact of the research, just questioning how much it supports your statement.
- Presence or absence of other nicotinic agonists, inverse agonists, and antagonists, and relative concentrations of each
- Effects vary wildly with nicotine concentration levels in plasma/interstitial fluid, as if it's an entirely different drug depending on how much is present
- etc.
You're drawing a direct line from one agonist the paper only mentions once to a psychological effect that the paper doesn't even describe. You may or may not be right, but this paper is at best a citation for a separate study to test your hypothesis.