Re:Congress, at Last Minute, Drops Requirement to Obtain War...
by nikcub on Wednesday December 26, 2012 @01:43AM
(#4968439)
I think there is a real business opportunity in hosting email offshore for US customers, out of the reach of US laws and subpoena's.
I know you preach encryption, but there is a lot that can still be subpoenad outside of the encrypted message payloads, such as login IP addresses, destination email adresses, frequency of messages, etc.
Re:Congress, at Last Minute, Drops Requirement to Obtain War...
by napoleond on Wednesday December 26, 2012 @02:20AM
(#4968509)
That's a really good point, and I agree. Offering multiple server locations is definitely on the road-map, but doing it well (ie. without providing a false sense of security) is an entirely separate and mostly legal challenge--as a Canadian company, we would be susceptible to mutual legal assistance treaties with the US, so we'd have to set up companies in a few different countries with different legal environments and then lay out the trade-offs in a transparent way.
Hopefully, we'll get to it, but if another startup gets there first we'd be much obliged ;) In the meantime we will focus on the big problem that's already right in front of us; I would encourage anyone who needs to operate outside of US legal influence to use a different mailserver (perhaps their own) and manage their own PGP keys.
We would eventually like to offer multiple options for server location, but that isn't feasible in the short term.