Re:Everyone should slow down AI development except for me
by cgio on Sunday September 13, 2026 @07:17AM
(#49682668)
For practical uses they are there. Arguably the frontier models are worse for some of these practical tasks. And keep in mind, people will use maybe frontier for 1/10th of the work, planning and review, and go open source for rest. The question is if they manage to impose outside us. If not, they are losing competitiveness.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Everyone should slow down AI development except for me
by user43928 on Sunday September 13, 2026 @08:13AM
(#49683125)
I always thought switching from a SOTA model to a dumber model after planning was a terrible idea.
Mostly I heard this from people who I got the impression have little experience in developing greenfield software with agentic AI. Often the same people who talk about spec frameworks.
I fundamentally disagree with the approach. I believe the ability to autonomously evaluate, test, and adjust during long horizon tasks is critical to using AI efficiently.
Re:Everyone should slow down AI development except for me
by rescbr on Sunday September 13, 2026 @11:46AM
(#49685274)
Well, it's the enterprise software house pipeline... The software architect writes the spec, hands it down to the implementation team, senior leads, junior devs or offshore teams codes it.
I also disagree with the approach, this is cargo-culting the existing ways of working.
Re:Everyone should slow down AI development except for me
by jurgenburgen on Sunday September 13, 2026 @03:17PM
(#49687604)
> this is cargo-culting the existing ways of working.
I think you mean the existing anti-patterns. They don’t call them ivory tower architects for nothing.