Re:American Medical Association backs classification of near...
by theycallmeritik on Sunday September 13, 2026 @04:01AM
(#49681232)
Calling simple myopia a disease feels like a push to get insurance companies to cover basic vision care, but calling half the human population "diseased" seems like standard medicalization creep.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:American Medical Association backs classification of near...
by rzmmm on Sunday September 13, 2026 @04:15AM
(#49681344)
Almost no myopia in hunter-gatherer populations. I don't view it as "disease" but it's not physiological state either.
Re:American Medical Association backs classification of near...
by Moomoomoo309 on Monday September 14, 2026 @07:58AM
(#49695375)
I don't think you'd make it far as a hunter-gatherer if you had physiological myopia. Both of my parents are severely nearsighted (my dad around -4 or -5, my mom is worse than -8), and all of my siblings have myopia. It's definitely genetic too, but for less severe myopia, I think it's our environment.