News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:HuggingFace: Security.txt by bensyverson on Friday September 11, 2026 @12:00PM (#49660622)
Looks about as effective as Robots.txt
Re:HuggingFace: Security.txt by cgannett on Friday September 11, 2026 @12:05PM (#49660720)
Robots.txt became 0% effective eventually. But this? With the way LLMs work? You never know.
Re:HuggingFace: Security.txt by Den_VR on Friday September 11, 2026 @01:30PM (#49662121)
People still rail against Robots.txt crimes, to the point of self destructing all their own content.
Re:HuggingFace: Security.txt by dguest on Friday September 11, 2026 @02:21PM (#49662945)
Claude seems to follow robots.txt by default. Actually at my organization our theory is that this is why no one is finding our public results any more.
Re:HuggingFace: Security.txt by warkdarrior on Friday September 11, 2026 @02:56PM (#49663480)
I am adding it to my instruction-following training data, as a negative sample.