News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Thom's account on an exchange with OpenAI regarding non-s... by raincole on Thursday September 10, 2026 @04:49PM (#49649984)
First of all I put "generosity" in quotes because I don't believe a corporation as big as OpenAI is even capable of acting out of generosity. It's always one of the three: A) PR B) commoditizing complements C) stupidity.

In this case it's more like C) though, as in hindsight the best move OpenAI could do is insisting that they just used an insurmountable number of tokens to exhaust all the published directions. They absolutely shouldn't have thought of negotiating with Buckmaster over the Clay prize at all, let alone trying to manipulate him into a situation where Alpöge is specifically excluded.

Re:Thom's account on an exchange with OpenAI regarding non-s... by fn-mote on Thursday September 10, 2026 @08:00PM (#49651762)
> the best move OpenAI could do is insisting that they just used an insurmountable number of tokens to exhaust all the published directions

So… lie more? They knew the approach and started there.

At least they were honest about that.

Re:Thom's account on an exchange with OpenAI regarding non-s... by eru on Thursday September 10, 2026 @11:17PM (#49653148)
Your theory of how companies work is certainly interesting.

It sounds like you think they have solved the principal–agent problem?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal%E2%80%93agent_proble...