News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem by Mawr on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @04:32AM (#49623199)
Surely this has nothing to do with specifically table tennis, nor that it's amateur.

A better example would be mixed boys/girls sports classes in school, where the boys deliberately hold back as to not injure/scare the girls.

It's a pretty obvious and human thing not to go out and completely destroy a much weaker opponent. We're social animals after all.

There also may be an element of energy conservation, there's objectively no need to put in any more effort than necessary. Inefficient.

Re:The Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem by sodic on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @05:55AM (#49623882)
I think the difference is that, in the table tennis example, it happens unconsciously and you can't help it. But you're right, it likely happens in most sports.

The mixed boys/girls classes example is, as you said, deliberate. And I too remember holding back on purpose in such situations when I was a kid.

With the arcade, no one was deliberately holding back. I'm sure of it.

Re:The Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem by PsylentKnight on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @08:53AM (#49625766)
Is it that you’re holding back against weaker opponents, or that you’re more excited and engaged when you’re playing against someone that forces you closer to the edge of your ability?
Re:The Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem by aswegs8 on Friday September 11, 2026 @09:13AM (#49657872)
I am pretty sure if you play at pro level you train this out of yourself. But then, the marathon / running examples where certain milestones get broken by one person and then suddenly by a host of others, is a counterargument.