News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:On the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem by charm137 on Tuesday September 08, 2026 @02:29PM (#49614602)
It's astounding that the thought to dissociate one of the mathematicians from the proposed publication was driven by their corporate institutional affiliation - and that that exclusion was suggested by a scientist themselves! This is like a researcher from CMU saying to an NYU researcher that their collaborator, being from MIT, is a problem - this is as ridiculous as that!

Progress in humanity's knowledge now has to play second fiddle to narrow corporate interests as IPO timings near (both of which wouldn't exist anyway if generations of mathematicians hadn't paved the way for AIs to become as good as they have).

Re:On the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem by curt15 on Tuesday September 08, 2026 @03:25PM (#49615545)
The scientist allegedly making that request comes from a machine learning background. Perhaps he's not familiar with the culture in mathematics regarding authorship. That sort of squabbling over author priority would be unconscionable to mathematicians.
Re:On the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem by tensor on Tuesday September 08, 2026 @03:58PM (#49616107)
No, it's common to list authors alphabetically in a lot of computer science journals too.
Re:On the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem by contubernio on Tuesday September 08, 2026 @04:02PM (#49616182)
Bubeck is familiar with how publishing works in mathematics.