News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Central bankers rethink their devotion to slaying inflation by danenania on Sunday December 23, 2012 @05:24PM (#4960918)
You have spelled out a basic and common economic fallacy. The sole purpose of money is to be spent. A person's rate of saving vs. immediate consumption simply reflects a longer term vs. a shorter term outlook. Instead of splurging on a bunch of electronics today, you're saving up so you can start a new business in five years. Nobody keeps money under their mattress indefinitely or dumps it in a lake.

Now, with that in mind, why on earth should the government try to dictate the 'correct' level of short term vs. long term financial planning? Why should long term planning, which leads to the formation of new businesses and increases society's wealth, be penalized in favor of consumption and debt? Aside from its ugly totalitarian implications (the government should decide for everyone how they use their money), it's completely economically wrongheaded and disproportionately harms the poorest members of society.

Re:Central bankers rethink their devotion to slaying inflation by confluence on Sunday December 23, 2012 @06:15PM (#4961070)
If we didn't punish people for saving no one would buy the things that come out of those long term productive businesses. See Japan and the paradox of thrift. Why invest if there is no growing demand in risky businesses?

Your last argument is emotional crap. Tell me again how the poor suffer so much as compared to 100 years ago.

Furthermore the government sets a lot of things we think are necessary. Taking your argument to the extreme: Who is the government to say child labor is illegal? We are denying the world productive labor and consumption!