News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Central bankers rethink their devotion to slaying inflation by eli_gottlieb on Sunday December 23, 2012 @04:59PM (#4960834)
"Saving" makes much more sense when you view it as collecting debt for the future. It's in the Government's and banks best interest to inflate the currency to limit the repayment of your debts.

Other way around: inflation devalues existing debts. A small, predictable inflation is a little economic rule that says, "Actual goods and services today are this percentage better than a mere promise of goods and services one year from now."

This sounds like it's immoral, in a way, encouraging consumption and profligacy. But of course, your consumption is someone else's sale; what it really encourages is the production and sale of actual goods and services that hold value better than money (anything from steel to apples to video games). Predictable inflation is a check and balance on the otherwise-natural tendency of capitalism to eat itself by valuing capital assets above all else.

Re:Central bankers rethink their devotion to slaying inflation by pjzedalis on Sunday December 23, 2012 @05:20PM (#4960903)
I don't disagree. Some get upset about governments and banks "printing money." My point was they are not upset/concerned to do so as it benefits them.
Re:Central bankers rethink their devotion to slaying inflation by maeon3 on Monday December 24, 2012 @12:38PM (#4963473)
if printing money without earning it and collecting on those debts were a good thing for the economy then it wouldn't be a problem if everyone did it.

it'll help stimulate the economy if i print up some 100 dollar bills. yeah! why are people getting bent out of shape because of my contribution to productivity?