News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Finding a Bug in Dummit and Foote's Abstract Algebra by psYchotic on Monday September 07, 2026 @05:20PM (#49603104)
Help me out, I feel dumb.

The first criterion for a function is stated as:

> The first item in each pair comes from A.

The counter-evidence for the proposition says:

> Let A = {}, and B = {1}. Let f: A -> B = {}

How does this f satisfy the first criterion, if A is uninhabited? It feels like this function can't be invoked. Am I thinking too much in terms of types here?

Re:Finding a Bug in Dummit and Foote's Abstract Algebra by changoplatanero on Monday September 07, 2026 @05:24PM (#49603142)
When there are no pairs, its certainly true that the first element of each pair comes from A. Just like if there are no living dinosaurs its true that all living dinosaurs speak English.
Re:Finding a Bug in Dummit and Foote's Abstract Algebra by psYchotic on Monday September 07, 2026 @05:43PM (#49603280)
That helps. Thank you!

I was trying to come up with something to explain why I couldn't see it myself: every element of an empty set of integers is both even and odd. This feels counterintuitive to me, until I flip it around into a question: what is the set of all integers that are both even and odd?

Re:Finding a Bug in Dummit and Foote's Abstract Algebra by mitxela on Monday September 07, 2026 @06:32PM (#49603729)
Neat trick
Re:Finding a Bug in Dummit and Foote's Abstract Algebra by jibal on Monday September 07, 2026 @11:45PM (#49605445)
Well done. Finding a way to look at things so that results that seemed unintuitive seem intuitive can be powerful and satisfying.