Re:Following legal advice, the Nitter project will continue
by alansaber on Sunday September 06, 2026 @03:22PM
(#49589865)
AI is good at volume, bad at accuracy and nuance. Of all the tasks to go through with a fine-toothed comb (ie, manually) legal is one.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Following legal advice, the Nitter project will continue
by bix6 on Sunday September 06, 2026 @05:24PM
(#49591111)
And yet all the lawyers are dripping in AI. I got a near final doc from one the other day with a bunch of perplexity bullshit in it. How is this real life…
Re:Following legal advice, the Nitter project will continue
by alansaber on Monday September 07, 2026 @05:36AM
(#49596153)
Just as many junior devs are serving slop PRs. Unfortunately, you can only take a horse to water.
Re:Following legal advice, the Nitter project will continue
by misstuned on Monday September 07, 2026 @03:28AM
(#49595074)
Genuine question - isn't legal stuff one of the things AI should in theory be very good at? Legalese is like code, in that every word is very strictly defined and there to do a specific job in the text. I feel like that's one of the things AI would be good at writing and interpreting.
Re:Following legal advice, the Nitter project will continue
by alansaber on Monday September 07, 2026 @05:40AM
(#49596191)
It's far from trivial to set up anything more formalised than a loose taxonomy. People have been trying for a few decades now. AI will help automate this formalisation with graphs etc but it's not good enough yet for you to give a judge 13m LOC of mathlic proving your client isn't guilty.