News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The most surprising thing I've seen in 2009, courtesy of ... by YuriNiyazov on Wednesday February 25, 2009 @11:27PM (#495437)
how long did that take in real time?
Re:The most surprising thing I've seen in 2009, courtesy of ... by pg on Thursday February 26, 2009 @12:27AM (#495509)
It's so hard to guess. I remember it taking about 3 days, but not working all day. I know there were 5400 half-second intervals when I typed at least one keystroke (that's what the numbers at the top mean).
Re:The most surprising thing I've seen in 2009, courtesy of ... by briancooley on Thursday February 26, 2009 @08:16AM (#495812)
It would be really interesting to see timestamps, particularly in longer works.

Two reasons: 1) You could see when the Eureka! moments occur. 2) To easily get a real measure of how long it really takes to write.

I have a real problem with 2), both with underestimating how long it will take to do things I think will be easy to write, and overestimating things I think will be hard. Of course, there's a lot more to writing than typing, but it could provide important information that is tedious to track at a high level and impossible to track at the level of granularity that this app could.

Re:The most surprising thing I've seen in 2009, courtesy of ... by kulkarnic on Thursday February 26, 2009 @05:32PM (#496543)
5400 half-seconds is 45 minutes. So, assuming you take 2 min to think for every 1 min of typing, that's still working on the essay just 45 minutes everyday (for 3 days).

I think (from comment above: "not working all day") you took much longer than the figure above? Perhaps a lot more thought goes into an essay than I imagine?