News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on 44% on ARC-AGI-1 in 67 cents. Parent comment

Re:44% on ARC-AGI-1 in 67 cents by bkaae on Tuesday September 01, 2026 @10:55AM (#49522809)
There is no language in the training of this, so there is no l.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:44% on ARC-AGI-1 in 67 cents by _ache_ on Tuesday September 01, 2026 @02:03PM (#49525523)
In computer science, that is technically a language. A formal language if you want to look it up on Wikipedia.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:44% on ARC-AGI-1 in 67 cents by FridgeSeal on Tuesday September 01, 2026 @10:39PM (#49531093)
Technically correct, but not in a functionally useful way.

The “L” in LLM’s generally refers to human-language specifically. You’d expect to feed it…human text. Nitpicking that the human text also constitutes a mathematical language is like, correct, but so general as to be unhelpful.

[ Parent | on HN ]