Maybe it doesn't detract from the value of the research, but you wanted to convey that research to readers like OP and me, otherwise you wouldn't have written it/had an LLM generate it, and posted to your blog.

I found the prose full of jargon that just wasn't comprehensible, like "sales motion", "perfect shape", "shelf ranked", "opaque majority". I can figure out what some of these mean by context, but they did make your article a tough read. I suspect that a lot of the jargon is LLMese, I see tons of unfamiliar jargon and impenetrable sentence structure in LLM-generated PRs at work. I can usually work out what the LLMese means, but it's definitely hard to do that with human-written prose.

Now there is a valid critique , thank you