That video is quite biased. Just tell your clanker to critique it. It will point out that those numbers are quite cherry picked, and leaving out important details. E.g. the „GHG would reduce by only 2.6%“ study assumes that all crop production stays the same, which doesn’t make any sense.

I don't think it's biased. I think it makes all the sense in the world.

They have exactly one guy as the expert in this video and he contributes all the facts. That’s bias.

So someone presenting the facts can be biased. Prove his facts are wrong and then I can agree.