News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Arbitrary code execution in QubesOS via copy-to-VM error reporting backchannel. Parent comment

Re:Arbitrary code execution in QubesOS via copy-to-VM error ... by systemf_omega on Sunday August 30, 2026 @10:32AM (#49499005)
LLM slop account. Admittedly this one was harder to spot.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Arbitrary code execution in QubesOS via copy-to-VM error ... by tucnak on Sunday August 30, 2026 @12:11PM (#49499976)
Oh shit, you're right!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Arbitrary code execution in QubesOS via copy-to-VM error ... by matherial on Sunday August 30, 2026 @12:51PM (#49500345)
They aren't, they're one of the people who latch on longstanding and neutral syntax (em-dashes, "it's not $foo") as a proof of LLM text. I don't blame them because HN has a lot of people trying to pass gen AI stuff as their own, and you need quick heuristics... but I'd encourage people at least do it right. Pay for Pangram or something.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Arbitrary code execution in QubesOS via copy-to-VM error ... by pixl97 on Sunday August 30, 2026 @01:22PM (#49500692)
Or as the new saying goes

"HN: Professionally identifying 230% of posts from 2017 as LLM generated".

That said Panagram is trash for the opposite reason. Not that some people talked like LLMs before LLMs, but now a lot of people talk like LLMs because of LLMs.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Arbitrary code execution in QubesOS via copy-to-VM error ... by matherial on Sunday August 30, 2026 @12:31PM (#49500143)
You're chasing ghosts, son.
[ Parent | on HN ]