News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nate Silver confuses cause and effect, ends up defending ... by tlb on Thursday December 20, 2012 @03:13PM (#4949692)
The villains in this story (ratings agencies) had lots of models, bad and good. They chose to publicly report the ones that suited their interest, rather than the most accurate ones.

The way to improve the situation is to educate the consumers of those models (securities purchasers) about what models are best, and which are misleading.

It's more productive to say, "Buyer beware, sellers are misleading you in the following ways..." than, "Shame on corrupt sellers!". Silver's book is doing the first, which does not constitute defense of corruption.

Re:Nate Silver confuses cause and effect, ends up defending ... by tomrod on Thursday December 20, 2012 @06:20PM (#4950637)
I'm not sure I follow. Ex ante the models were unknown as to their performance?