News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. Sanctions Against the a/I Collective by p-e-w on Saturday August 29, 2026 @03:57AM (#49487875)
> Many people will call it "just the normal right thing to do".

It’s absolutely not a normal thing to do for entities that want to use the “we are just infrastructure, our users are responsible for their actions” excuse.

In fact, such entities (e.g. power grid, telecom) are often legally prohibited from choosing their clients, and in exchange aren’t held responsible for what their clients do with their services.

Re:U.S. Sanctions Against the a/I Collective by mdp2021 on Saturday August 29, 2026 @04:12AM (#49487964)
Also see my other post.

So if you had a hammer in your yard, and somebody took it and misused it, you would not be responsible, but if you gave it to your neighbour and he used it to crush a skull, you the owner of the hammer would be responsible? It is clearly at least the opposite. Abstract from the "paid service", but see that.

The rule you propose (filtering would create responsibility) makes no sense. Try to show why it would be so, maybe.

Re:U.S. Sanctions Against the a/I Collective by inigyou on Saturday August 29, 2026 @11:44AM (#49490838)
The government should pass a law forbidding blog hosts from choosing their clients if that's what they want to happen.