Re:Qwen 3.8-Flash-Next releasing tomorrow (125B a6B)
by SwellJoe on Wednesday August 26, 2026 @05:47AM
(#49446304)
To be fair to Qwen, we've all been there.
Re:Qwen 3.8-Flash-Next releasing tomorrow (125B a6B)
by embedding-shape on Wednesday August 26, 2026 @06:17AM
(#49446523)
Maybe I got lucky (as I know others have had this issue), or it recovered by itself, but never had this happen with GPT models for as long as I've used codex, and I run it with "--sandbox danger-full-access --dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox" 100% of the times.
Re:Qwen 3.8-Flash-Next releasing tomorrow (125B a6B)
by SwellJoe on Wednesday August 26, 2026 @03:15PM
(#49454311)
No, I mean, every human who spends enough time working with computers eventually makes a dumb blunder, very often this specific one (using `rm -rf` in a way that has further reaching effects than intended). But, I do want to use models that don't make those kinds of mistakes, which is why I happily pay for a bunch of subscriptions for the best models.
I've just spent two days testing it qualitatively (after the quantitative results were kind of bad, but promising), the official BF16 weights, and it keeps fucking up very basic things, like doing "rm -rf sessions/$id" without really checking or making sure $id is defined, so it ends up deleting more.
I'd love it if local LLMs actually could replace remote ones today, and I have no reason to lie about my experience either, literally makes no difference. But I too got hopefully reading the sentiment on the internet about Qwen 3.8, but it's just not there (yet) for local professional software development.
Verbatim logs from an open session where this literally just happened:
Oh no indeed :)