News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A new ceiling for Λ: the de Bruijn–Newman constant by zaik on Tuesday August 25, 2026 @05:11PM (#49440691)
> energy to assess the correctness and relevance of such "results".

The author claims to have a proof in Lean. Checking the correctness of the result is now reduced to checking the definition of the constant.

Re:A new ceiling for Λ: the de Bruijn–Newman constant by steinwinde on Tuesday August 25, 2026 @05:27PM (#49440889)
> reduced to checking the definition of the constant

But this doesn't mean the remaining task is small or doesn't ask much from the reviewer, does it?! Otherwise we'd see a considerable turn-out of new findings on https://palomar-registry.org/ or https://github.com/Vilin97/lean-pool , or not?! (A considerable number of the presented proofs claim new results, as far as I can tell.)