Re:Quick impressions: A week of using Codex more than Claude
by esalman on Saturday August 22, 2026 @03:06AM
(#49397352)
So it's a problem when a poverty striken nation expect aid to combat child mortality, but shelling out $150m on Juicero or $500m on Theranos is fine? Please try to answer without sounding like a psychopath.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Quick impressions: A week of using Codex more than Claude
by kev009 on Saturday August 22, 2026 @03:52AM
(#49397579)
Whatever point you are trying to make is not coming across, what even are these numbers and what do they have to do with citizenry of the United States? You also have a quantum view of the United States that it is and isn't impoverished, so it's supposed to liquidate to fund some other foreign entity that is not rate paying? I'm dizzy.
Re:Quick impressions: A week of using Codex more than Claude
by esalman on Saturday August 22, 2026 @11:23AM
(#49400706)
It's probably not coming across because you're looking up too many synonyms.
Re:Quick impressions: A week of using Codex more than Claude
by kev009 on Saturday August 22, 2026 @04:52PM
(#49403786)
"Looking up synonyms" huh? You have yet to make a coherent argument and keep trying to attack the messenger, typical behavior when people get called out for false entitlement. Your "psychopathy" accusations are pure cowardice.
Re:Quick impressions: A week of using Codex more than Claude
by wonnage on Saturday August 22, 2026 @10:12PM
(#49405605)
Go ahead and explain why you decided to use “quantum” and “liquidate” then bro
Re:Quick impressions: A week of using Codex more than Claude
by kev009 on Saturday August 22, 2026 @10:37PM
(#49405700)
Fluency in one's native language, what an achievement. Neither of these words are complicated. The treasury is unsalable bonds according to the thread, which means the US is in a financial collapse, but also has unlimited capacity to support someone's special interests abroad. Master logicians at work here.