Re:Two-for-one: Amazon.com’s Socially Engineered Replacement...
by pbhjpbhj on Tuesday December 18, 2012 @08:25AM
(#4937347)
Speculation: They probably force the supplier or courier to foot the bill. Maybe sack the delivery driver with a carefully vague intimation that they've been stealing?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Two-for-one: Amazon.com’s Socially Engineered Replacement...
by tomkarlo on Tuesday December 18, 2012 @07:51PM
(#4940613)
Well, that's super-paranoid. Amazon uses major name suppliers like UPS. So it's not their employee to sack. And I doubt UPS would allow Amazon to go around randomly accusing their employees of theft.