Re:Two-for-one: Amazon.com’s Socially Engineered Replacement...
by mseebach on Tuesday December 18, 2012 @07:06AM
(#4937137)
Well, yes and no :) Even when you're self-insured (which is what you are when you've got risk factored into your margins), you're still insured.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Two-for-one: Amazon.com’s Socially Engineered Replacement...
by nwienert on Tuesday December 18, 2012 @12:00PM
(#4938349)
That's a ridiculous twist of words. That's not self-insured, it's just planning for loss, which is exactly what it's called (Unplanned expenditures).
Re:Two-for-one: Amazon.com’s Socially Engineered Replacement...
by mseebach on Tuesday December 18, 2012 @12:26PM
(#4938492)
No it's not. If you book it under "Unplanned expenditures" then you're not insured. If you try to determine your risk in such a way that you can budget a fixed sum for coverage and reasonably expect not to exceed it (ie. not an unplanned expenditure) in the same way an insurance company would do it, they you're insured.
Re:Two-for-one: Amazon.com’s Socially Engineered Replacement...
by nwienert on Thursday December 20, 2012 @04:26PM
(#4950131)
It's literally a line item in the budget for unplanned expenditures. Sounds ridiculous, but you are planning for the unplanned. I'm just saying calling that "insurance" dilutes the meaning of what insurance actually is, which requires a transaction between two separate companies.