Re:Memory prices climb 500% in 12 months, up to 10x the lowe...
by RickHull on Tuesday August 18, 2026 @06:30PM
(#49353708)
> or just an excuse to fleece regular buyers
In a market with healthy competition (no collusion), this generally can't happen. Every single vendor is incentivized to lower their prices slightly at all times, with a floor at cost plus margin.
Re:Memory prices climb 500% in 12 months, up to 10x the lowe...
by nubg on Tuesday August 18, 2026 @06:56PM
(#49353997)
why plus margin? the floor is cost
Re:Memory prices climb 500% in 12 months, up to 10x the lowe...
by pixl97 on Wednesday August 19, 2026 @10:50AM
(#49362434)
Floor is below cost if you think you can put one of your competitors out of business before you run out of money, and you'll make the money back after doing so. And this includes even after fines.
Re:Memory prices climb 500% in 12 months, up to 10x the lowe...
by nubg on Wednesday August 19, 2026 @03:33PM
(#49366139)
that's true, also see "loss leaders" like milk in supermarkets
Re:Memory prices climb 500% in 12 months, up to 10x the lowe...
by coldtea on Wednesday August 19, 2026 @05:39AM
(#49359173)
>In a market with healthy competition (no collusion), this generally can't happen.
We're talking about the memory market here.
The "healthy competition (no collusion). Every single vendor is incentivized to lower their prices slightly at all times, with a floor at cost plus margin" is the fairy-tale version they teach at 101s.
The question is how much of this demand is actually based on AI, or just an excuse to fleece regular buyers (and AI is not really the actual demand driving such prices).
Memory manufacturers have driven up prices via collusion many times in the past (and paid fines for it), without AI or some similar high demand vertical market existing.
But I don't think it's the case now, see my answer elsewhere here for why.