Abdominal fat predicts heart disease risk better than BMI

Re:Abdominal fat predicts heart disease risk better than BMI by adrian_b on Sunday August 16, 2026 @11:49AM (#49321136)

"Fiber" is a vague term that is used for the carbohydrates that cannot be digested by humans, so they reach the large intestine, where they are fermented by bacteria.

This includes a part of the "resistant starch", which is poorly digested by humans, so a big part of it reaches the large intestine.

So yes, the "resistant" starch counts as "fiber", but not all of it, because some part of it is hydrolyzed into glucose, which is absorbed.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Abdominal fat predicts heart disease risk better than BMI by paimapi on Sunday August 16, 2026 @12:58PM (#49321699)

this is bordering on pedantry but aren't there classifications by different regulatory and medical institutions of what fibers are and aren't? as far as I'm aware, a starch isn't a fiber unless a special exemption is carved out for it and only if that starch meets certain criteria for how it behaves

looking into RS's in general, it seems like there is a special carve-out after a lot of industry lobbying for very specific forms of RS's to be classified as fibers and only if they have physiological effects similar to the classic definition of fiber: https://www.fda.gov/media/113663/download

for practical reasons, I suppose I'm just not understanding why you don't eat more 'classical' fibers. psyllium husk, for eg, which is cheap and effective and has been utilized as a digestive aid in Chinese traditional medicine for centuries (one of the few to survive rigorous empirical evaluation, naturally)

[ Parent | on HN ]