Which, I suppose, is the final chapter to his false victim narrative. A posthumous legacy that he was bullied to death, absolved of his misdeeds.
His prime accuser is an unrepentant racist who believes non white people should not be in academia.
This was a deliberate attempt to get black academics fired supported by Britains right wing press. The Telegraph and Mail being owned by a family of literal fascists who supported Oswald Mosley.
This story is being filtered through a lens of media coverage so filthy it makes the truth impossible to see.
The people calling for his ouster supported Boris Johnson, a journalist fired multiple times before becoming prime minister for fabricating stories.
They isn’t about integrity.
No they haven't. The reviews all pointed to Arday plagiarizing and being comically dishonest.
>They isn’t about integrity.
It's about integrity, academic integrity at the highest levels.
I've seen Kehinde Andrews defend Arday repeatedly about plagiarism.
He says
1. It was deemed "misquoting" and poor scholarly work that should've been caught by his advisor 2. And the university did an investigation and ruled it wasn't plagiarism.
Basically, the mom who will always love their ax murderer son.