Can I ask which parts? I wrote the intro section by hand, and left the rest of it Fable-generated with significant "guidance" and rounds of re-writing.

I think the current weakest part is the explanation of the science behind it, but I'm curious if there was anything specific that jumped out at you.

generally it helps to make the readme more of a map of content where you have the big picture for each section and then let people dive via links where they want to know more.

Added in a Table of Contents at the top to improve it for now. May do more substantial re-writes later.

"These are the exact commanded sRGB values shipped in every export." Tell me what that sentence means and why each of those words is there. Challenge: In the context of the first sentence of a section, with no preceding target for "these." If you manage to assign a meaning: Why do I care, at that point in the readme, about the information in that meaning?

"A warm filter is not a tinted overlay." That's lovely (I suppose), but only an AI would start a section by telling me what something is not, rather than what it is. It's also not really a calamari salad, but it didn't see fit to mention that. This time.

Strongest AI indicator: Words that may carry meaning, if you don't think so hard, but don't work towards any meaningful narrative (because there is none) -- they carry the LLMs need to generate text, not the reader's need to gain progressive understanding. All of this writing without a mind model of the reader shares the same flaws.