Re:Every Fucking Website (2020)
by YetAnotherNick on Friday August 14, 2026 @03:50PM
(#49303759)
Why does static site of Europe's parliament need big cookie banner? Or is that the parliament which created this law doesn't know what you know or they are doing "malicious compliance".
Re:Every Fucking Website (2020)
by nonethewiser on Friday August 14, 2026 @04:00PM
(#49303860)
Clearly they are just trying to rile up users against the EU.
Because they want to track people and they need consent for that.
Re:Every Fucking Website (2020)
by YetAnotherNick on Saturday August 15, 2026 @01:22AM
(#49307888)
I know the technical reason. I was contesting the GP's comment that most site display banner "Instead of complying". Most website needs basic tracking and there is nothing wrong in it.
We are just conditioned to see it without difference in basic tracking and tracking all your clicks across site and selling it to advertisers.
Because they use a commercial service (AT Internet) for analytics and visitor tracking as stated in their cookies policy and cookie inventory. This information is readily available through the cookie banner.
If properly following a law is malicious, then it's a bad law.
There's a reason you don't hear about people "maliciously complying" with HIPAA or PCI laws. Because that's just called compliance.
No excuses for poorly done EU regulations.
You can comply with the law without banners and dark pattern defaults. These businesses are maliciously complying by making things more obnoxious and painful than they need to be.
A comparison would be a store who was angry the law says you have to be 21 to buy alcohol and starts requesting everyone, even people not buying alcohol, to show ID or be kicked out. That's not a bad law, that's a bad business maliciously complying.
As many have said before:
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29529148[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38299135
[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46552795