News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Zed: Delta by 8n4vidtmkvmk on Wednesday August 12, 2026 @09:12PM (#49280687)
Can you elaborate? Why wouldn't you just check in your code when you're done your bit instead of working on the same commit together?
Re:Zed: Delta by nugator on Thursday August 13, 2026 @04:04AM (#49282997)
I like it because we don't have to do the this dance all the time: * Commit * Push * Say: Now it's pushed * Pull

We can just work together, talking and writing code. Works great with people you work well with and are aligned with.

Re:Zed: Delta by saghm on Friday August 14, 2026 @01:25PM (#49301847)
This feels a bit like asking why I would send my coworkers a Slack message instead of an email. For some things, send and wait for them to look at it is fine, but if I want to have a conversation, it's a lot less work to use something that's real-time. If we're both working on nice modular features, and they just need to use the code I wrote as-is (or only make some small targeted changes that they can do without my help), git branches are useful. Sometimes it's been useful to be able to prototype something in real-time while bouncing ideas off each other or if I'm trying to help them get something specific working in their code (but I don't have nearly as much familiarity with the other parts of what they're doing).