Deletes all instances of Microsoft's GDID and prevents minting of new ones

Re:Deletes all instances of Microsoft's GDID and prevents mi... by jorl17 on Sunday August 09, 2026 @06:54PM (#49237055)

It's missing a couple of wrinkles, surfaces, belt-and-suspenders, belt-and-braces, knobs, no-ops, "things that narrate", bookkeeping, stranded sessions, "the gate leads the arrangement", shit-gated, "to be wired after we've dealt with the parked features", "that's not the whole story", "the interface wants classes", slots and "whatever-backed interfaces".

All of this is enhanced claude-era vocabulary minted at the pool-of-efficiency, built as a de-facto evolution of legacy-style language.

Humans and their comment postambles, amirite?

(Here's a literal quote from a claude session: "After the f-war, the evidence itself stops lying."

I don't understand why companies are not focusing more on making these highly intelligent models speak a decent language. Maybe they are, and they're failing. But the last few months have made it pretty difficult to engage with these highly intelligent assistants.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Deletes all instances of Microsoft's GDID and prevents mi... by userbinator on Sunday August 09, 2026 @07:41PM (#49237450)

You'd think that LLMs are trained on human writing, so they should sound human to some extent, but I've never come across a real human writing like that.

The last time I tried ChatGPT, it had the tone of "bland, attempting-to-be-helpful-but-stupid corporate HR person", which is annoying but still much more human-sounding than this mess.

[ Parent | on HN ]