News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why is Everyone in Tech so sad? by tomjen3 on Saturday August 08, 2026 @06:28AM (#49220457)
Florence Nightingale had a permanent subsidy from her very wealthy father. (Essentially IBI). She chose to do something with her life. But there were thousands of times the number of people with wealthy parents than there are famous people. That is because most people really won't do anything special with themselves, unless they have to.

Granted, society benefits most from the work of the exceptional, so it may still be worth it.

I also don't believe that we have eroded free time over the last generation. As one example, many now have a robot vacuum cleaner, which frees whatever time they previously spent vacuuming. They may be spending a lot of their time on things, but as long as those are things by choice, it's still free time.

Re:Why is Everyone in Tech so sad? by simonask on Saturday August 08, 2026 @10:12AM (#49221980)
> Granted, society benefits most from the work of the exceptional, so it may still be worth it.

That's a baffling proposition. I think society benefits overwhelmingly more from the sum of average contributions, not the rare exceptional contribution.

I do think we're missing out on a huge number of exceptional contributions due to the circumstances people face who would otherwise be free and able to make such contributions. Instead they are sending emails.