Re:Canadian camouflage company claims to have created perfec...
by talmand on Friday December 14, 2012 @11:48AM
(#4921808)
I see nothing in that article that lends credibility to this.
He doesn't want to show the cloak actually working but mockups are fine. If the mockups are accurate then how is that different than showing an actual photograph of the cloak working?
The information needs to be secure, but hey, here's a list of people who've seen it working. Also, by the way, this is how it works.
Two sources to verify the technology weren't able to be contacted. Not that there was no comment or response, they couldn't be contacted.
No names of who exactly in the U.S military has seen the cloak working to verify their judgement of the technology.
One name from the Canadian military who has seen the cloak, but the Canadians are going to pass for now and might revisit it in the future.
The cloak has to be designed for each application, which means it's use is likely highly limited.
So, is this completed and ready-to-go technology that needs funding for mass production or is that he needs funding to clean up a handful of potential problems before it is ready for field use?
Sorry, I must see it in action to believe it works as described and is actually useful.
He doesn't want to show the cloak actually working but mockups are fine. If the mockups are accurate then how is that different than showing an actual photograph of the cloak working?
The information needs to be secure, but hey, here's a list of people who've seen it working. Also, by the way, this is how it works.
Two sources to verify the technology weren't able to be contacted. Not that there was no comment or response, they couldn't be contacted.
No names of who exactly in the U.S military has seen the cloak working to verify their judgement of the technology.
One name from the Canadian military who has seen the cloak, but the Canadians are going to pass for now and might revisit it in the future.
The cloak has to be designed for each application, which means it's use is likely highly limited.
So, is this completed and ready-to-go technology that needs funding for mass production or is that he needs funding to clean up a handful of potential problems before it is ready for field use?
Sorry, I must see it in action to believe it works as described and is actually useful.