I use claude designed markdown renderer. This site is using the same.

Others, for example using the same renderer:

1. NPM Supply Chain Attack Techniques: https://npm-supply-chain-attack-techniques.pagey.site/

2. NPM Ecosystem Threat Report: https://npm-supply-chain-attacks-25-26.pagey.site/

AI generated "slop" is here, and it's here to stay. In case you do find some error in content, point that out please.

The content generally reads like Claude slop. Lots of self-narration, throat clearing sentences, overuse of verbs like “lands”, overuse of tidy sentence conclusions.

It’s all fixable with a modicum of effort but combined with the slop styling I’m not sure what you’re trying to achieve other than just pushing slop online.

There is nothing wrong with using AI tools to do your work, or part of it. If there are genuine inaccuracies in the content, please point those out and I will fix them asap, so everyone can benefit.

These things are here, they are here to stay, and they will only get better. Better to learn to use them in correct manner, than shrug them off without any logical reasoning.

The problem is your content both looks and reads like low effort slop. Not that AI tools are here to stay.

define slop

My guy, stop asking me to do all the legwork for you.

i didn't begin with one

Is it? Looks perfectly legible. Do people expect their forest-ignoring tree-nitpicking validated nowadays?

If the website looks like slop, why would anyone believe the content in it to be anything but slop too?

Because if you are someone that generates good content you might not know anything about designing or hosting websites. But they can ask an AI to do it for them so they can focus on what they are good at, generating interesting content.

Which might be true if the content weren’t also AI slop.

Mighty obsessed with slop, is that what you give Alex Karp?