The audacity to still claim biology is broadly different than computing is commendable.

Write a weasel program and you will see for yourself.

current = "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX"

target = "THE LORD OF THE RINGS"

loop {

  replicas = replication(current)
  replicas = mutation(replicas)
  current = naturalSelection(replicas)

  print("generation", i, current)
  
  if (current == target)
     break   

You can thus make "Dog" turn into a "Cat". I rest my case :)

Computational Substrates: How Well-formed, Self-replicating Programs Emerge from Simple Interaction - https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.19108

Brainfuck, Forth, Subleq, and most recently Z80 assembly programs with mutations, interactions, and self-modification. Z80 has an LDIR instruction that copies a block of data from one location in memory to another, which allows the "organisms" to reach/discover reproduction quicker and more reliably in repeated experiments. As soon as that happens, it inevitably takes over the "world".

Hm, sounds more like "Lord of the Flies" than Rings.

My Scope: Evolution proper (what happens after a replicator exists).

Once a self-replicating entity exists, the Weasel loop takes over. Conflating the origin of replicators with the mechanics of evolution itself mixes up two different things.

Laws of logic dictates if you can demonstrate E with R, M and N, then any additional variable is neither sufficient nor necessary.

From a strict theory-of-computation standpoint, if the core loop can be executed in code, then biological evolution is fundamentally an informational process, not a mystical "biological-only" phenomenon.

> As soon as that happens, it inevitably takes over the "world".

Agreed :). Looking forward to an epic battle of the pelennor fields.

> sounds more like "Lord of the Flies" than Rings.

Thats hilarious. "Lord of the Flies" it shall be henceforth :))

your example is intelligent design, not evolution. it has the telos baked in