Both seem to provide a unified interface across different harnesses/models. HarnessRouter exposes that as a developer API for embedding agent-powered features into products, with Task / Run / Session / Streaming / File / Artifact / Renderer contracts, plus tracing around harness/model behavior over time.
Is the main distinction that QM is a company workspace, while HarnessRouter is an embeddable harness layer for product teams and enterprises?
Both seem to provide a unified interface across different harnesses/models. HarnessRouter exposes that as a developer API for embedding agent-powered features into products, with Task / Run / Session / Streaming / File / Artifact / Renderer contracts, plus tracing around harness/model behavior over time.
Is the main distinction that QM is a company workspace, while HarnessRouter is an embeddable harness layer for product teams and enterprises?