Re:Show HN: Fuse – statically typed functional programming l...
by qsera on Sunday August 02, 2026 @09:26AM
(#49144502)
I wish you took Haskell's syntax as such. Why did you mix rust and possibly other stuff with it?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Fuse – statically typed functional programming l...
by the_unproven on Sunday August 02, 2026 @10:49AM
(#49145185)
Haskell is a great language with a really advanced type-system, although I found its syntax hard to read at times especially as I was exploring the language at first. On the other hand I really liked how Rust syntax was defined in terms of ADTs, Traits & Methods Impls, with type signatures required for functions. Hence I wished for a similar functional language that has such write-style and type concepts, but stripping away the borrow checker, mutations, etc.
Re:Show HN: Fuse – statically typed functional programming l...
by adastra22 on Sunday August 02, 2026 @03:28PM
(#49147514)
Just as general feedback, I think your experience matches up with more software developers than the GP. Haskell is really obtuse and unreadable for those who are not accustomed to it.